Won’t You Join The Dance? On Purposeful Questions and Nonsense Poems

‘Will you walk a little faster?’ said a whiting to a snail,
‘There’s a porpoise close behind us, and he’s treading on my tail.
See how eagerly the lobsters and the turtles all advance!
They are dancing on the shingle – will you come and join the dance?
Will you, won’t you, will you, won’t you, will you join the dance?
Will you, won’t you, will you, won’t you, won’t you join the dance?’

The first verse of the Lobster Quadrille, sung by the Mock Turtle in Alice In Wonderland.  A nonsense rhyme.  A parody of a nursery rhyme (‘won’t you come into my parlour…’).  A curious song.

Maybe it’s just children’s entertainment.  Or maybe it hides a powerful, purposeful question.

I like to think so anyway.  ‘Won’t you join the dance?’ is such a great question, working on so many different levels.  As my brain still seems to be stuck on how questions work, here are some thoughts on the source of its power.

The Milton Model of Language

This is going to take us back to NLP again, in particular to the work of Milton Erickson, a hypnotherapist.  He was exceptionally skilled at using language to help his clients relax, to tap into their own resources and to find the answers that would work for them.  He did this by being ambiguous and artfully vague.  His approach to language use is known as the Milton Model.

There are some elements of what we’d now call the Milton Model in the Lobster Quadrille.  It:

  • Is general and unspecific: ‘the dance’ can mean whatever the listener chooses it to mean
  • Distracts the conscious mind: how can these fish be dancing? leaving the poet free to ask the bigger question of the unconscious mind: won’t you join the dance?
  • Includes ambiguity: I can’t help wondering if that porpoise is really a purpose chasing after us… the conscious mind gets distracted trying to fathom it out
  • Deals with general understandings: the poem is nonsense, it has no logical or literal meaning, so the only way we can understand it is in a general, personal to us way
  • Gets past resistance: ‘will you join the dance’ might get a ‘no!’.  ‘Won’t you’ is more of an invitation. Can you feel the different reaction you get to the two questions?
  • Has an embedded command: the words emphasise the most important part, the bit we’re supposed to remember (in bold).  It’s a command as well as a question: ‘will you, won’t you, will you, won’t you, won’t you join the dance?’
  • Uses story and metaphor: the poem tells a story, paints a vivid picture and works beautifully at that level… and the deeper one too, if we’re ready to hear the question (and answer it, of course)

I have to confess my intention with these questions from poems was simply to include some favourites.  But this one has long had a powerful effect on me and I’m curious as to how it works.  Curious too (and curiouser, as Alice might say) about nonsense, and how it works, and what we can learn from it about skilful, artful language use that helps to create positive change.

Have you got any favourite nonsense poems that ‘speak’ to you despite their lack of obvious meaning?  Or is it best treated as nonsense, without sense, entertainment to make us smile and nothing deeper than that?